Table 8 CIVIL WAR TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
UNION COMMANDERS
McCLELLAN'S TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Williamsburg |
U |
C |
40,799 |
2,239 |
31,828 |
1,603 |
| Fair Oaks |
C |
U |
41,797 |
5,031 |
41,816 |
6,134 |
| Seven Days |
C |
C |
105,000 |
15,869 |
86,784 |
19,135 |
| Antietam |
U |
C |
75,316 |
12,410 |
51,844 |
13,724 |
| TOTAL(4) |
- |
- |
262,912 |
35,549 |
212,272 |
40,596 |
McClellan's TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All McClellan |
4 |
124 |
13.5 |
88 |
154 |
167 |
Rosecrans' TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Cornith |
C |
U |
21,147 |
2,520 |
22,000 |
4,233 |
| Stones River |
C |
U |
43,400 |
14,289 |
37,712 |
10,266 |
| Chickamauga |
C |
C |
58,222 |
16,170 |
66,236 |
18,454 |
| TOTAL(3) |
- |
- |
122,769 |
32,979 |
125,948 |
32,953 |
Rosecrans' TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Rosecrans |
3 |
97 |
26.9 |
101 |
268 |
262 |
Burnside's TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| New Bern |
U |
U |
6,500 |
471 |
1,800 |
578 |
| South Mountain |
U |
U |
28,480 |
1,813 |
17,852 |
2,685 |
| Fredricksburg |
U |
C |
106,000 |
12,653 |
72,500 |
5,377 |
| Knoxville |
C |
U |
440 |
100 |
4,000 |
813 |
| TOTAL(4) |
- |
- |
141,420 |
15,037 |
96,152 |
9,453 |
Burnside's TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Burnside |
4 |
147 |
10.6 |
159 |
67 |
156 |
Banks' TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Front Royal |
C |
C |
1,063 |
904 |
16000 |
50 |
| Winchester |
C |
C |
8,500 |
2,126 |
16,000 |
350 |
| Cedar Mountain |
U |
C |
8,030 |
2,553 |
16,898 |
1,338 |
| Pleasant Hill |
C |
U |
12,247 |
1,369 |
14,300 |
1,500 |
| TOTAL(4) |
- |
- |
29,840 |
6,952 |
63,198 |
3,238 |
Banks' TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Burnside |
4 |
47 |
23.3 |
215 |
109 |
110 |
CONFEDERATE COMMANDERS
Joe Johnston's TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Fair Oaks |
C |
U |
41,717 |
5,031 |
41,818 |
6,134 |
| Dallas |
U |
C |
12,000 |
2,800 |
10,000 |
700 |
| Kenesaw Mtn |
U |
C |
16,225 |
2,183 |
17,733 |
19,135 |
| Bentonville |
C |
U |
16,127 |
1,646 |
16,895 |
2,660 |
| TOTAL(4) |
- |
- |
86,146 |
11,660 |
86,444 |
9,934 |
Joe Johnston's TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Johnston |
4 |
100 |
11.5 |
85 |
135 |
115 |
Bragg's TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Perryvile |
U |
U |
36,900 |
4,211 |
16,000 |
3,396 |
| Stones River |
C |
U |
43,400 |
13,249 |
37,712 |
10,266 |
| Chickamauga |
C |
C |
58,222 |
16,170 |
66,326 |
18,454 |
| Chattanooga |
U |
U |
56,359 |
5,724 |
64,165 |
6,667 |
| TOTAL(4) |
- |
- |
194,881 |
39,354 |
184,203 |
38,783 |
Bragg's TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Bragg |
4 |
95 |
21.0 |
99 |
214 |
199 |
Beauregard's TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Bull Run |
U |
C |
28,452 |
2,639 |
32,232 |
1,987 |
| Shiloh |
C |
U |
62,682 |
13,044 |
40,335 |
9,735 |
| Drewery's Bluff |
U |
C |
15,800 |
4,160 |
18,000 |
2,500 |
| Petersburg |
U |
C |
16,100 |
1,700 |
2,200 |
300 |
| TOTAL(4) |
- |
- |
123,034 |
21,543 |
92,767 |
14,522 |
Beauregard's TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Beauregard |
4 |
75 |
15.7 |
67 |
232 |
118 |
HOOD'S TACTICAL RECORD AND PERFORMANCE
| Battle |
Attacker |
Winner |
union |
loss |
confederate |
loss |
| Peach Tree Creek |
C |
U |
20,139 |
1,710 |
18,832 |
2,500 |
| Atlanta |
C |
U |
30,477 |
3,722 |
36,934 |
8,000 |
| Ezra Church |
C |
U |
12,000 |
700 |
12,000 |
2,500 |
| Jonesboro |
C |
U |
14,170 |
179 |
23,811 |
4,725 |
| Jonesboro II |
C |
U |
20,460 |
1,274 |
12,661 |
2,000 |
| Franklin |
C |
U |
27,939 |
1,326 |
26,897 |
6,252 |
| Nashville |
U |
U |
49,773 |
3,061 |
23,207 |
5,962 |
| TOTAL(7) |
- |
- |
174,958 |
11,972 |
154,342 |
31,939 |
Hood's TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| All Hood |
7 |
88 |
20.6 |
267 |
78 |
183 |
Source: Livermore's Numbers and Losses
M. Collie May 1993
Back