Table 1 CIVIL WAR TACTICAL PERFORMANCE
(after Hattaway and Jones)
| Commander |
number |
% enemy men |
% casualties |
% enemy cas. |
Efficiency Index |
enemy Eff. Index |
| ATTACKS WON |
| Union* |
6 |
163 |
11 |
78 |
84 |
165 |
| Confederate* |
3 |
108 |
23 |
105 |
132 |
239 |
| Grant |
6 |
141 |
8 |
91 |
94 |
121 |
| Sherman |
1 |
162 |
6 |
64 |
98 |
101 |
| Lee |
2 |
66 |
28 |
97 |
225 |
142 |
| Jackson |
4 |
105 |
14 |
49 |
281 |
143 |
| ATTACKS LOST |
| Union* |
9 |
140 |
12 |
166 |
68 |
124 |
| Confederate* |
8 |
88 |
31 |
128 |
187 |
179 |
| Grant |
6 |
165 |
16 |
229 |
70 |
264 |
| Sherman |
3 |
142 |
12 |
502 |
23 |
162 |
| Lee |
1 |
85 |
37 |
121 |
307 |
317 |
| Jackson |
1 |
47 |
16 |
137 |
121 |
78 |
| DEFENSE WON |
| Union* |
8 |
115 |
20 |
77 |
179 |
187 |
| Confederate* |
9 |
71 |
10 |
59 |
124 |
68 |
| Grant |
1 |
155 |
21 |
122 |
170 |
323 |
| Sherman |
5 |
85 |
9 |
46 |
187 |
73 |
| Lee |
9 |
61 |
13 |
51 |
271 |
85 |
| Jackson |
5 |
75 |
18 |
82 |
221 |
137 |
| DEFENSE LOST |
| Union* |
3 |
92 |
24 |
94 |
239 |
132 |
| Confederate* |
6 |
61 |
22 |
126 |
165 |
84 |
| Grant |
0 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
| Sherman |
0 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
| Lee |
1 |
55 |
15 |
70 |
223 |
46 |
| Jackson |
0 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
| ALL BATTLES |
| Union* |
25 |
128 |
16 |
104 |
117 |
157 |
| Confederate* |
25 |
78 |
20 |
96 |
157 |
117 |
| Grant |
13 |
156 |
14 |
199 |
72 |
224 |
| Sherman |
9 |
106 |
9 |
77 |
120 |
98 |
| Lee |
13 |
64 |
18 |
68 |
266 |
116 |
| Jackson |
10 |
81 |
16 |
67 |
240 |
132 |
| Lee's Performace in nine battles(from Hattaway & Jones p.729) |
| Lee win attack |
1 |
104.7 |
21.6 |
130 |
102.6 |
- - |
| Lee lose attack |
1 |
90 |
37.4 |
121.8 |
235.6 |
- - |
| Lee win defense |
5 |
67.2 |
12.3 |
59.3 |
146.6 |
- - |
| Lee lose defense |
2 |
67 |
23.5 |
115.4 |
192 |
- - |
| Lee all battles |
9 |
75.6 |
19.7 |
92 |
158.4 |
- - |
|
* = from Hattaway & Jones 26 battle data base
Source: Livermore's Numbers and Losses
M. Collie May 1993
Back